If you read our last post Secure Access Using SAML, OAuth and OIDC or if you have a decent understanding of OAuth and you’re looking at OpenID Connect like “Why do I need an ID token and an access token?” then this post is for you! We’re going to discuss OAuth access tokens, OpenID Connect ID tokens, what those tokens are and why you probably want to use both.
OAuth vs OpenID Connect
A typical OAuth [Authorization Code] flow involving a website and third party resource provider looks like this.
OAuth Authorization Code Flow
The sequence of events can be described as follows.
- The user makes a request to the Application
- The in order to fulfill the request, the Application requires authorization from a 3rd party, so makes an auth code request
- Granting of an auth code requires the user’s agreement, so a request is forwarded to the user
- If th user authorizes the request, an auth code is issued to the Application
- The auth code, client id and client secret are submitted to the AuthZ Server in exchange for an access token
- The access token can then be used to authorize requests to the Resource Server
Now, let’s take a look at how a similar flow works with OpenID Connect.
OpenID Connect Authorization Code Flow
There is only one difference in the OpenID Connect flow: the issuance of an ID token. The details of that ID token are also quite strictly defined by the OpenID Connect specification. The OpenID Connect ID token is a signed JWT with clearly defined claims. It can also have other claims, which are left open-ended.
The Access Token
Before we get into why ID tokens are needed, it’s appropriate to discuss access tokens. After all, access tokens came first with OAuth. OpenID Connect is an extension of OAuth. In short, an access token is for the Resource Server. Only the Resource Server needs to know what it is since it’s only used to authorize access to resources from the Resource Server. Think of it like a [temporary] key that unlocks resources owned by the Resource Server. It doesn’t matter what’s in it as long as the Resource Server can validate it.
With that being said, it has become relatively common to use JWT access tokens. However, practically, access tokens do not have to be JWTs. Another trend is the use of bearer access tokens, which are tokens that can be used from any source. Like bearer bonds, bearer tokens endow the holder with whatever rights are associated with the asset, regardless of who (or what) that holder may be. Bearer tokens come with some great advantages: authorization overhead is low and distribution is easily scaled. The disadvantage is that if a bearer token is compromised then it can be used to impersonate an authorized user until it expires. For that reason, bearer access tokens are often short-lived.
Storing the Access Token
Let’s say for the sake of argument that you have a bearer access token that is used by a SPA (Single Page Application) to access resources from a REST API. It would be pretty slow to request an access token for every resource request made. So, naturally, you want the access token to live for the duration of several requests. You need to store it somewhere. But you also want its storage location to be relatively safe (i.e. not easily compromised).
The ID Token
Unfortunately, for the reasons cited above, you probably don’t want your access token to be available to your application, and if it is, then you should assume that it’s not consumable by your application. React Authentication: How to Store JWT in a Cookie by Ryan Chenkie does a pretty decent job explaining why you probably don’t want to make your access token available to your application and why you may want to store it in a HTTP-only cookie. But all of this raises the obvious question, “If access tokens aren’t available to the web application then how do you get all that great authorization data into the application?” The answer, of course, is the ID token.
With OpenID Connect, ID tokens are issued at the same as access tokens. The access token is considered closed to the application (and it very well may actually be closed to the application), but the ID token contains all the great authorization data that your application needs. It can have user information, access scopes and other claims. But another important difference between ID tokens and access tokens is that ID tokens, if compromised cannot be used to gain access into another system. ID tokens are strictly for the benefit of the authorized application.
Why You Want Both an Access Token and an ID Token
Access Tokens are needed, well, for access. They are what allow the application to consume resources that it doesn’t own. But access tokens should be considered closed to the application. So, the application can either query the necessary authorization data it needs from a separate API call, or an ID token can be issued at the time of authorization in order to provide that data. And the great thing about using a specification like OpenID Connect is that the contents of the ID token are pretty well-defined. So, it’s relatively easy to integrate with multiple authorization servers and still get the authorization data you need.